We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
3.7 after 4 votes Tags:
Well said!
Lois Linquist said:I'm a Mom and oh so ready to be a Grand Mom. Should I start a TwitterGrandmoms? Nope, not yet, but as an old Mom, perhaps I shouldn't have joined either since most of the Moms I've met are young with young children. Still, when I checked out Twitter Moms I thought perhaps I might have something to add at some time that might help a new Mom, pick up ideas about marketing, learn new skills, find new friends and maybe end up adopting a Grand or two (lol).
I'm old enough to remember women and girls forcing their way into mens groups, little league, football and other groups which all started after the bra burnings. It's actually hard for me to believe that women who fought so hard for inclusion in these groups and recognition of our perceived rights to be there would now question whether men shoud be allowed to join a group clearly designed for women. I'm no activist and abhored a lot of what I saw as the "revolution" but I am a big believer in "what's good for the goose". So, it is my belief that to exclude men, who just might have something to offer here, would be a mistake and in the end hypocritical if you truly believe in equal rights.
Lois
I got an OK before I signed up. I'm not a dad, but I think I can speak to this issue of male-ness on the site.
I actually stayed away because I thought it was exclusive until I got an invite. I just stuck to talking to Megan on Twitter about the site and about supporting moms and women. Then I asked about the invite and whether I could join because after the invite, I thought of what a nice way to meet and talk to moms and women about solving problems and such.
She expressed the same concern on behalf of worried members. But I asked her to check me out and let me know.
I wouldn't take away the name of the site nor would I change the theme. I'm a social media enthusiast. I help moderate a major authority ning site on the subject. Having said that, I have a good understanding on how to navigate these networks. There's a certain finesse in treading these sites. I believe that you have to be there for an appropriate reason. The community can judge a member by his interaction with other members.
So for here, obviously I wouldn't think to inject myself into a discussion where my input just wouldn't flow with the direction of the conversation. Unless of course I was asked. Like I wouldn't comment on questions of breastfeeding and motherly opinions on certain things. Really is none of my business, at least not the degree where my male presence is absolutely warranted.
On the other hand, SAHM or mompreuer based conversations are. So I may or may not see fit to offer something to the dialogue. And it would be received well because it's appropriate, that is, it does not disturb the theme of the site, or the general direction of the dialogue.
So if I may lead a good example, my hope and expectation (perhaps yours as well) is that my interaction here is well received and nonintrusive ... supportive and not subversive ... congruent and not intersecting :) ... and may set a tone for other male and non Dad members. And that would allow the site to keep the name, and keep the theme, keep free from conflict, and continue to be such a valuable resource and community for moms and women across the world.
Would you agree?
© 2009 Created by Megan Calhoun