Would you rather have fame for a short while, or no fame at all?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ann on October 2, 2009 at 11:05am

I think the perks of fame would be good ($$$, free stuff, parties), but not the downsides(paparazzi, scandals, always needing top be "on"). And if fame dried up, so would the $$$, free stuff, and parties. I guess I'll keep throwing my own parties and shopping sales at Gap ;)

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Julie on October 2, 2009 at 12:01pm

Well I think I would love the fame for bit for all perks but then I wouldn't mind being back to to normal and not having the spotlight. I love doing stuff on the blog , and on twitter but there is certain stuff I don't put out to the public. I would love the extra $$$.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Nina on October 2, 2009 at 12:30pm

Interesting indeed. I would choose not being famous at all. Besides the richest in showbiz, for example, are those behind the limelight. The producers are more rich and powerful than the artists.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Pamela M. Kramer on October 2, 2009 at 7:20pm

I'm going with the no fame. I'm ok with it. lol

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Lorie on October 3, 2009 at 6:31pm

You know, I don't really have any desire to be famous...unless being famous for a short time would make me REALLY rich!

Then I would go for famous and make a lot of money, then enjoy a regular life!

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Teri on October 4, 2009 at 3:19am

I think I would like to be well known by people for doing what I do well.

As far as the fame part goes, I don't like what many people have to do to stay famous. I am just too uncomforable going out without my panties....

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Cute Girl on October 4, 2009 at 3:26am

Of course not

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Cute Girl on October 4, 2009 at 3:28am

There are other

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Maria Anna Tan on October 5, 2009 at 2:28am

I chose to never be famous at all.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by angela Church on October 5, 2009 at 4:57am

I would never be famous at all because with fame comes the desire for more.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Stacey says on October 5, 2009 at 7:47am

Depends on what the fame was for. Not all fame is 'good fame'. If I could be famous for a short while for something positive, something I did that helped others, then I'd take it.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Krista Cortese on October 5, 2009 at 11:44am

No fame at all. I wouldn't want to have to worry about my appearance all the time as I'm running from the gym to Target and back home to take care of a 7 month old...Once you are in the spotlight you are criticized for how you look ALL THE TIME! No, thanks:)

▶ Reply to This

▶ Reply to This

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page